Proteomic profiling platforms head to head: Leveraging genetics and clinical traits to compare aptamer- and antibody-based methods

Author:

Katz Daniel H.1ORCID,Robbins Jeremy M.1ORCID,Deng Shuliang1ORCID,Tahir Usman A.1ORCID,Bick Alexander G.2ORCID,Pampana Akhil2ORCID,Yu Zhi2ORCID,Ngo Debby1ORCID,Benson Mark D.1ORCID,Chen Zsu-Zsu1ORCID,Cruz Daniel E.1ORCID,Shen Dongxiao1ORCID,Gao Yan3ORCID,Bouchard Claude4ORCID,Sarzynski Mark A.5ORCID,Correa Adolfo3ORCID,Natarajan Pradeep267ORCID,Wilson James G.1,Gerszten Robert E.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

2. Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.

3. University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.

4. Human Genomic Laboratory, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.

5. Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

6. Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

7. Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Abstract

High-throughput proteomic profiling using antibody or aptamer-based affinity reagents is used increasingly in human studies. However, direct analyses to address the relative strengths and weaknesses of these platforms are lacking. We assessed findings from the SomaScan1.3K ( N = 1301 reagents), the SomaScan5K platform ( N = 4979 reagents), and the Olink Explore ( N = 1472 reagents) profiling techniques in 568 adults from the Jackson Heart Study and 219 participants in the HERITAGE Family Study across four performance domains: precision, accuracy, analytic breadth, and phenotypic associations leveraging detailed clinical phenotyping and genetic data. Across these studies, we show evidence supporting more reliable protein target specificity and a higher number of phenotypic associations for the Olink platform, while the Soma platforms benefit from greater measurement precision and analytic breadth across the proteome.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Cited by 84 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3