No replication of direct neuronal activity–related (DIANA) fMRI in anesthetized mice

Author:

Choi Sang-Han1ORCID,Im Geun Ho1ORCID,Choi Sangcheon2ORCID,Yu Xin2ORCID,Bandettini Peter A.3ORCID,Menon Ravi S.4ORCID,Kim Seong-Gi15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

2. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.

3. Section on Functional Imaging Methods and Functional MRI Facility, NIMH, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.

4. Centre for Functional and Metabolic Mapping, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada.

5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

Direct imaging of neuronal activity (DIANA) by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) could be a revolutionary approach for advancing systems neuroscience research. To independently replicate this observation, we performed fMRI experiments in anesthetized mice. The blood oxygenation level–dependent (BOLD) response to whisker stimulation was reliably detected in the primary barrel cortex before and after DIANA experiments; however, no DIANA–like fMRI peak was observed in individual animals’ data with the 50 to 300 trials. Extensively averaged data involving 1050 trials in six mice showed a flat baseline and no detectable neuronal activity–like fMRI peak. However, spurious, nonreplicable peaks were found when using a small number of trials, and artifactual peaks were detected when some outlier-like trials were excluded. Further, no detectable DIANA peak was observed in the BOLD-responding thalamus from the selected trials with the neuronal activity–like reference function in the barrel cortex. Thus, we were unable to replicate the previously reported results without data preselection.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3