Pathways for diversifying and enhancing science advocacy

Author:

Tormos-Aponte Fernando12ORCID,Brown Phil3ORCID,Dosemagen Shannon4ORCID,Fisher Dana R.5ORCID,Frickel Scott6ORCID,MacKendrick Norah7ORCID,Meyer David S.8ORCID,Parker John N.9

Affiliation:

1. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

2. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MA, USA.

3. Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.

4. Open Environmental Data Project, New Orleans, LA, USA.

5. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

6. Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

7. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

8. University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.

9. University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Abstract

Science is under attack and scientists are becoming more involved in efforts to defend it. The rise in science advocacy raises important questions regarding how science mobilization can both defend science and promote its use for the public good while also including the communities that benefit from science. This article begins with a discussion of the relevance of science advocacy. It then reviews research pointing to how scientists can sustain, diversify, and increase the political impact of their mobilization. Scientists, we argue, can build and maintain politically impactful coalitions by engaging with and addressing social group differences and diversity instead of suppressing them. The article concludes with a reflection on how the study of science-related mobilization would benefit from further research.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference172 articles.

1. Collaborative Frame Construction in Social Movement Campaigns: Bisphenol-A (BPA) and Scientist–Activist Mobilization

2. Embodied, embedded or both? Investigating experts and expertise in two Greater Boston social movements;Frickel S.;Soc. Mov. Stud.,2022

3. Out of the Labs and into the Streets: Scientists Get Political

4. Atomic War or Peace;Einstein A.;The Atlantic,1947

5. A. K. Smith A Peril and a Hope: The Scientists’ Movement in America 1945–1947 (MIT Press rev. ed 1971).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3