Seismically detected cratering on Mars: Enhanced recent impact flux?

Author:

Daubar Ingrid J.1ORCID,Garcia Raphaël F.2ORCID,Stott Alexander E.2ORCID,Fernando Benjamin3ORCID,Collins Gareth S.4ORCID,Dundas Colin M.5ORCID,Wójcicka Natalia4ORCID,Zenhäusern Géraldine6ORCID,McEwen Alfred S.7,Stähler Simon C.6ORCID,Golombek Matthew8ORCID,Charalambous Constantinos4ORCID,Giardini Domenico6ORCID,Lognonné Philippe9ORCID,Banerdt W. Bruce8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

2. Institut Supérieur de l’Aéronautique et de l’Espace (ISAE-SUPAERO), Université de Toulouse, 10 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France.

3. Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK.

4. Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

5. U.S. Geological Survey, Astrogeology Science Center, 2255 N. Gemini Dr, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA.

6. Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.

7. Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.

8. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA.

9. Université Paris Cité, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France.

Abstract

Seismic observations of impacts on Mars indicate a higher impact flux than previously measured. Using six confirmed seismic impact detections near the NASA InSight lander and two distant large impacts, we calculate appropriate scalings to compare these rates with lunar-based chronology models. We also update the impact rate from orbital observations using the most recent catalog of new craters on Mars. The snapshot of the current impact rate at Mars recorded seismically is higher than that found using orbital detections alone. The measured rates differ between a factor of 2 and 10, depending on the diameter, although the sample size of seismically detected impacts is small. The close timing of the two largest new impacts found on Mars in the past few decades indicates either a heightened impact rate or a low-probability temporal coincidence, perhaps representing recent fragmentation of a parent body. We conclude that seismic methods of detecting current impacts offer a more complete dataset than orbital imaging.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3