Has the Supreme Court become just another political branch? Public perceptions of court approval and legitimacy in a post- Dobbs world

Author:

Levendusky Matthew12ORCID,Patterson Shawn2ORCID,Margolis Michele1,Pasek Josh3ORCID,Winneg Kenneth2ORCID,Jamieson Kathleen H.24ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

2. Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

3. Department of Communication and Media, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

4. Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Abstract

Have perceptions of the U.S. Supreme Court polarized, much like the rest of American politics? Because of the Court’s unique role, for many years, it remained one of the few institutions respected by both Democrats and Republicans alike. But the Court’s dramatic shift to the right in recent years—highlighted by its Dobbs decision in 2022—potentially upends that logic. Using both eight waves of panel data and 18 nationally representative surveys spanning two decades, we show that while there was little evidence of partisan polarization in earlier years, in 2022 and 2023, such patterns are clear in favorability, trust, legitimacy, and support for reform. Factors that used to protect the Court—like knowledge about it and support for key democratic values—no longer do so. The Court has also become more important to voters, and will likely remain a political flashpoint, with disquieting implications for the Court’s place in our polity.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Reference60 articles.

1. J. Gibson G. Caldeira Citizens Courts and Confirmations (Princeton Univ. Press 2009).

2. J. Hibbing E. Theiss-Morse Congress as Public Enemy (Cambridge Univ. Press 2012).

3. The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto

4. A. Gou E. Erskine J. Romoser SCOTUSblog: Stat Pack for the Supreme Court’s 2021-2022 Term; https://bit.ly/3TgJw5t.

5. D. Gregorian “Sotomayor suggests Supreme Court won’t ‘survive the stench’ of overturning Roe v. Wade ” NBC News 1 December 2021.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Going beyond Dobbs : an exploration of support for court reform;Politics, Groups, and Identities;2024-09-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3