Vanishing twins, spared cohorts, and the birthweight of periviable infants born to Black and white women in the United States

Author:

Catalano Ralph1ORCID,Stolte Allison2ORCID,Casey Joan3ORCID,Gemmill Alison4ORCID,Lee Hedwig5,Bustos Brenda6ORCID,Bruckner Tim27

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

2. Department of Health, Society, and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.

3. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.

4. Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

5. Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

6. Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.

7. Center for Population, Inequality, and Policy, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.

Abstract

Pregnancies ending before 26 weeks contribute 1% of births but 40% of infant deaths in the United States. The rate of these “periviable” births to non-Hispanic (NH) Black women exceeds four times that for NH whites. Small male periviable infants remain most likely to die. NH white periviable males weigh more than their NH Black counterparts. We argue that male infants born from twin gestations, in which one fetus died in utero (i.e., the vanishing twin syndrome), contribute to the disparity. We cannot directly test our argument because “vanishing” typically occurs before clinical recognition of pregnancy. We, however, describe and find associations that would emerge in vital statistics were our argument correct. Among male periviable singleton births from 288 monthly conception cohorts (January 1995 through December 2018), we found an average NH white advantage of 30 grams (759 grams versus 729 grams). Consistent with our argument, however, cohorts signaling relatively few survivors of the vanishing twin syndrome showed no disparity.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3