Can personalized digital counseling improve consumer search for modern contraceptive methods?

Author:

Athey Susan1ORCID,Bergstrom Katy2,Hadad Vitor3,Jamison Julian C.45ORCID,Özler Berk6ORCID,Parisotto Luca7,Sama Julius Dohbit89

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

2. Department of Economics, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA.

3. Amazon Lab126, Sunnyvale, CA 94089, USA.

4. Business School, University of Exeter, Exeter EX44PU, UK.

5. Global Priorities Institute, Oxford University, Oxford OX2 0DJ, UK.

6. Development Research Group, The World Bank, Washington DC, DC 20433, USA.

7. Department of Economics, Bocconi University, Milano, MI 20100, Italy.

8. Department of Gynaecology-Obstetrics, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.

9. Yaoundé Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Yaoundé, Cameroon.

Abstract

This paper analyzes a randomized controlled trial of a personalized digital counseling intervention addressing informational constraints and choice architecture, cross-randomized with discounts for long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), such as intrauterine devices (IUDs). The counseling intervention encourages shared decision-making (SDM) using a tablet-based app, which provides a tailored ranking of modern methods to each client according to their elicited needs and preferences. Take-up of LARCs in the status quo regime at full price was 11%, which increased to 28% with discounts. SDM roughly tripled the share of clients adopting a LARC at full price to 35%, and discounts had no incremental impact in this group. Neither intervention affected the take-up of short-acting methods, such as the pill. Consistent with theoretical models of consumer search, SDM clients discussed more methods in depth, which led to higher adoption rates for second- or lower-ranked LARCs. Our findings suggest that low-cost individualized recommendations can potentially be as effective in increasing unfamiliar technology adoption as providing large subsidies.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3