Scale-dependent changes in ecosystem temporal stability over six decades of succession

Author:

Meng Yani1ORCID,Li Shao-peng1ORCID,Wang Shaopeng2ORCID,Meiners Scott J.3ORCID,Jiang Lin4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Zhejiang Tiantong Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Institute of Eco-Chongming, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241, China.

2. Institute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Science and Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

3. Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, IL, 61920, USA.

4. School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.

Abstract

A widely assumed, but largely untested, tenet in ecology is that ecosystem stability tends to increase over succession. We rigorously test this idea using 60-year continuous data of old field succession across 480 plots nested within 10 fields. We found that ecosystem temporal stability increased over succession at the larger field scale (γ stability) but not at the local plot scale (α stability). Increased spatial asynchrony among plots within fields increased γ stability, while temporal increases in species stability and decreases in species asynchrony offset each other, resulting in no increase in α stability at the local scale. Furthermore, we found a notable positive diversity-stability relationship at the larger but not local scale, with the increased γ stability at the larger scale associated with increasing functional diversity later in succession. Our results emphasize the importance of spatial scale in assessing ecosystem stability over time and how it relates to biodiversity.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference79 articles.

1. The Individualistic Concept of the Plant Association

2. J. O. Luken “Directing ecological succession” (Chapman and Hall London 1990).

3. D. C. Glenn-Lewin R. K. Peet T. T. Veblen “Plant succession: Theory and prediction” (Chapman and Hall London 1992).

4. K. PrachL. R. Walker “Comparative plant succession among terrestrial biomes of the World” (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2020).

5. The Strategy of Ecosystem Development

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3