Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”

Published:2016-03-04 Issue:6277 Volume:351 Page:1037-1037
ISSN:0036-8075
Container-title:Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Science

Author:

Gilbert Daniel T.¹,King Gary¹,Pettigrew Stephen¹,Wilson Timothy D.²

Affiliation:

1. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

2. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Abstract

A paper from the Open Science Collaboration (Research Articles, 28 August 2015, aac4716) attempting to replicate 100 published studies suggests that the reproducibility of psychological science is surprisingly low. We show that this article contains three statistical errors and provides no support for such a conclusion. Indeed, the data are consistent with the opposite conclusion, namely, that the reproducibility of psychological science is quite high.

Funder

NSF

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference11 articles.

1. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

2. B. Carey Psychology’s fears confirmed: Rechecked studies don’t hold up. New York Times (27 August 2015) p. A1.

3. Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit.

4. Why people are reluctant to tempt fate.

5. Toward a Physiology of Dual-Process Reasoning and Judgment: Lemonade, Willpower, and Expensive Rule-Based Analysis

Cited by 358 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Replication studies in the Netherlands: Lessons learned and recommendations for funders, publishers and editors, and universities;Accountability in Research;2024-08-13

2. Statistical positivism, psychoanalysis, and the theory of sociocultural models: A review of three approaches to acculturation;International Journal of Intercultural Relations;2024-07

3. Open Access, Scholarly Communication, and Open Science in Psychology: An Overview for Researchers;Sage Open;2024-04

4. Tempered Expectations: A Tutorial for Calculating and Interpreting Prediction Intervals in the Context of Replications;Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science;2024-01

5. Libertarian Paternalism, Nudging, and Public Policy;SSRN Electronic Journal;2024