The Scientific Wealth of Nations

Author:

May Robert M.1

Affiliation:

1. Office of Science & Technology, Albany House, 94-98 Petty France, London SW1H 9ST, UK.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference20 articles.

1. Analysis of the Quality of the UK Science Base (UK Office of Science and Technology London in press). 2. European Report on Science and Technology Indicators 1994 (European Commission Publications Luxembourg 1994). 3. H. Moore Ed. World Science Report 1996 (Unesco Paris 1994).

2. Katz J. S., et al., The Changing Shape of British Science (Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Sussex, UK, October, 1995);

3. 5. Australian Science: Performance from Published Papers (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1996).

4. The ISI database has many acknowledged biases and limitations. Some problems have to do with the compilation of the database. It includes citations of books and chapters in edited books but it does not include the citations in such publications. Other publications such as government and other agency reports and working papers are essentially omitted. It does not cover all significant scientific journals [for example many Australian journals are not covered (5)]. Journals from non-English-speaking countries are not as well represented as those from English-speaking countries. There are problems with shifting definitions of countries (for example the breakup of the USSR); the ISI database preserves the 1981 list of countries through time ignoring changes in boundaries. Other problems are associated with citation patterns. Papers that describe technical methods may attract thousands of reflexive citations while pathbreaking papers may be cited only slightly for many years. Review articles can mask the primary papers they review. Citation patterns vary among fields (for example average citation rates are far higher in molecular biology and genetics than in materials science). Spectacular scientific errors may attract many citations although we think this may distort overall counts less than is sometimes suggested; interesting errors can moreover spark new ideas and developments in science. Self-citation (which accounts for at least 10% of all citations) may bias some of the results. For a more detailed discussion of these questions see (2) (5) and E. Garfield Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science Technology and Humanities (Wiley New York 1979).

5. The ISI database covers some additional fields of social science but [following (5)] these are omitted from our analysis.

Cited by 460 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3