Genomic and archaeological evidence suggest a dual origin of domestic dogs-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Genomic and archaeological evidence suggest a dual origin of domestic dogs

Published:2016-06-03 Issue:6290 Volume:352 Page:1228-1231
ISSN:0036-8075
Container-title:Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Science

Author:

Frantz Laurent A. F.¹,Mullin Victoria E.²,Pionnier-Capitan Maud³⁴,Lebrasseur Ophélie¹,Ollivier Morgane³,Perri Angela⁵,Linderholm Anna¹⁶,Mattiangeli Valeria²,Teasdale Matthew D.²,Dimopoulos Evangelos A.¹⁷,Tresset Anne⁴,Duffraisse Marilyne³,McCormick Finbar⁸,Bartosiewicz László⁹,Gál Erika¹⁰,Nyerges Éva A.¹⁰,Sablin Mikhail V.¹¹,Bréhard Stéphanie⁴,Mashkour Marjan⁴,Bălăşescu Adrian¹²,Gillet Benjamin³,Hughes Sandrine³,Chassaing Olivier³,Hitte Christophe¹³,Vigne Jean-Denis⁴,Dobney Keith¹⁴¹⁵,Hänni Catherine³,Bradley Daniel G.²,Larson Greger¹

Affiliation:

1. The Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and History of Art, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

2. Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.

3. CNRS/ENS de Lyon, IGFL, UMR 5242 and French National Platform of Paleogenetics, PALGENE, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 46 Allée d’Italie, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France/Université Grenoble Alpes, Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine (LECA), F-38000 Grenoble, France.

4. CNRS/Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle/Sorbonne Universités, Archéozoologie, Archéobotanique: Sociétés, Pratiques et Environnement (UMR 7209), CP56, 55 rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France.

5. Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

6. Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4352, USA.

7. School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

8. School of Geography, Archaeology and Palaeoecology, Queen's University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.

9. Osteoarchaeological Research Laboratory, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.

10. Archaeological Institute, Research Centre for the Humanities, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.

11. Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab. 1, 199034 Saint-Petersburg, Russia

12. The National Museum of Romanian History, 12 Calea Victoriei, 030026 Bucharest, Romania.

13. Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes, CNRS-UMR6290, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.

14. Department of Archaeology, School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen, St. Mary's, Elphinstone Road, AB24 3UF, UK.

15. Department of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool, 12-14 Abercromby Square, Liverpool L69 7WZ, UK.

Abstract

A dogged investigation of domestication The history of how wolves became our pampered pooches of today has remained controversial. Frantz et al. describe high-coverage sequencing of the genome of an Irish dog from the Bronze Age as well as ancient dog mitochondrial DNA sequences. Comparing ancient dogs to a modern worldwide panel of dogs shows an old, deep split between East Asian and Western Eurasian dogs. Thus, dogs were domesticated from two separate wolf populations on either side of the Old World. Science , this issue p. 1228

Funder

European Research Council

Natural Environmental Research Council

Junior Research Fellowship

BDI CNRS

ERC

Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference118 articles.