Deep flaws in a mercury regulatory analysis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Deep flaws in a mercury regulatory analysis

Published:2020-04-17 Issue:6488 Volume:368 Page:247-248
ISSN:0036-8075
Container-title:Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Science

Author:

Aldy Joseph¹,Kotchen Matthew²,Evans Mary³,Fowlie Meredith⁴,Levinson Arik⁵,Palmer Karen⁶

Affiliation:

1. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

2. School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

3. Robert Day School of Economics and Finance, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA, USA.

4. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

5. Department of Economics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

6. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, USA.

Abstract

The U.S. EPA ignores scientific evidence, economic best practice, and its own guidance

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference11 articles.

1. EPA, Compliance Cost, HAP Benefits, and Ancillary Co-Pollutant Benefits for “National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units – Reconsideration of Supplemental Finding and Residual Risk and Technology Review” (EPA, 2018); www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-12/documents/mats-an-cost-benefit_memo12-2018.pdf.

2. EPA Fed. Regist. 84 24 (2019); www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-07/pdf/2019-00936.pdf.

3. J. Aldy ., Report on the Proposed Changes to the Federal Mercury and Air Toxics Standards. Report of the External Environmental Economics Advisory Committee (E-EEAC, 2019); www.e-eeac.org/mats-report.

4. EPA Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Mercury and Air Toxics Standards EPA-452/R-11-011 (December 2011); www3.epa.gov/ttnecas1/regdata/RIAs/matsriafinal.pdf.

5. OMB, Circular A-4: Regulatory Analysis (Executive Office of the President, 17 September 17, 2003); www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/circulars/A4/a-4.pdf.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Toxic pollution and labour markets: uncovering Europe’s left-behind places;Review of Regional Research;2024-09-12

2. Co‐Benefits, Countervailing Risks, and Cost–Benefit Analysis;Human and Ecological Risk Assessment;2024-04-05

3. Quantifying co‐benefits of water quality policies: An integrated assessment model of land and nitrogen management;American Journal of Agricultural Economics;2023-08-08

4. Bioremediation of environments contaminated with mercury. Present and perspectives;World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology;2023-07-13

5. Particulate Matters: Trump EPA Deregulatory Science, Fossil Fuels, and Racist Regimes of Breathing;Antipode;2022-03-02