Response to Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Response to Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”

Published:2016-03-04 Issue:6277 Volume:351 Page:1037-1037
ISSN:0036-8075
Container-title:Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Science

Author:

Anderson Christopher J.¹,Bahník Štěpán²,Barnett-Cowan Michael³,Bosco Frank A.⁴,Chandler Jesse⁵⁶,Chartier Christopher R.⁷,Cheung Felix⁸,Christopherson Cody D.⁹,Cordes Andreas¹⁰,Cremata Edward J.¹¹,Della Penna Nicolas¹²,Estel Vivien¹³,Fedor Anna¹⁴,Fitneva Stanka A.¹⁵,Frank Michael C.¹⁶,Grange James A.¹⁷,Hartshorne Joshua K.¹⁸,Hasselman Fred¹⁹,Henninger Felix²⁰,van der Hulst Marije²¹,Jonas Kai J.²²,Lai Calvin K.²³,Levitan Carmel A.²⁴,Miller Jeremy K.²⁵,Moore Katherine S.²⁶,Meixner Johannes M.²⁷,Munafò Marcus R.²⁸,Neijenhuijs Koen I.²⁹,Nilsonne Gustav³⁰,Nosek Brian A.³¹³²,Plessow Franziska³³,Prenoveau Jason M.³⁴,Ricker Ashley A.³⁵,Schmidt Kathleen³⁶,Spies Jeffrey R.³¹³²,Stieger Stefan³⁷,Strohminger Nina³⁸,Sullivan Gavin B.³⁹,van Aert Robbie C. M.⁴⁰,van Assen Marcel A. L. M.⁴⁰⁴¹,Vanpaemel Wolf⁴²,Vianello Michelangelo⁴³,Voracek Martin⁴⁴,Zuni Kellylynn⁴⁵

Affiliation:

1. Russell Sage College, Troy, NY, USA.

2. University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

3. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

4. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

5. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA.

6. Mathematica Policy Research, Washington, DC, USA.

7. Ashland University, Ashland, OH, USA.

8. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

9. Southern Oregon University, Ashland, OR, USA.

10. University of Göttingen, Institute for Psychology, Göttingen, Germany.

11. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

12. Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

13. Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.

14. Parmenides Stiftung, Munich, Germany.

15. Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

16. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

17. Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.

18. Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.

19. Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

20. University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany.

21. Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

22. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

23. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

24. Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

25. Willamette University, Salem, OR, USA.

26. Arcadia University, Glenside, PA, USA.

27. University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

28. University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

29. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

30. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

31. Center for Open Science, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

32. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

33. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

34. Loyola University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

35. University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.

36. Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, USA.

37. University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

38. Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

39. Coventry University, Coventry, UK.

40. Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

41. Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

42. University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

43. University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

44. University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

45. Adams State University, Alamosa, CO, USA.

Abstract

Gilbert et al . conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration’s Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.

Funder

Laura and John Arnold Foundation

John Templeton Foundation

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference10 articles.

1. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

2. Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”

3. Confidence intervals and replication: Where will the next mean fall?

4. Replication and Researchers' Understanding of Confidence Intervals and Standard Error Bars

5. Investigating Variation in Replicability

Cited by 148 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Grand challenge: social psychology without hubris;Frontiers in Social Psychology;2024-01-05

2. Eleven years of student replication projects provide evidence on the correlates of replicability in psychology;Royal Society Open Science;2023-11

3. On effects that do occur versus effects that can be made to occur;Frontiers in Social Psychology;2023-08-23

4. MRI-based basal forebrain atrophy and volumetric signatures associated with limbic TDP-43 compared to Alzheimer's disease pathology;Neurobiology of Disease;2023-05

5. Epistemic Functions of Replicability in Experimental Sciences: Defending the Orthodox View;Foundations of Science;2023-02-18