Technology, Experimentation, and the Quality of Survey Data-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Technology, Experimentation, and the Quality of Survey Data

Published:1998-05-08 Issue:5365 Volume:280 Page:847-848
ISSN:0036-8075
Container-title:Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Science

Author:

Bloom David E.¹

Affiliation:

1. The author is at the Harvard Institute for International Development, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference5 articles.

1. Adolescent Sexual Behavior, Drug Use, and Violence: Increased Reporting with Computer Survey Technology

2. Pendleton A. McCarthy J. Cherlin A. Assessing the Quality of Retrospective Marriage Histories: The June 1980 Current Population Survey (unpublished manuscript 1984).

3. Grosh M. E., Glewwe P., A Guide to Living Standards Measurement Study Surveys and Their Data Sets, LSMS Working Paper No. 120 (World Bank, Washington, DC, 1995).

4. Schuman H., Presser S., Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1981).

5. Rosenberg L. Bennett N. Brown T. Croft T. Gallup-Black A. O'Connell M. Shapiro R. I thankfor comments and discussions.

Cited by 52 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Inconsistencies in Adolescent Self-Reported Sexual Behavior: Experience from Four Randomized Controlled Trials;Prevention Science;2022-09-20

2. Toward e‐Scales : Digital Administration of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Rating Scales;Movement Disorders Clinical Practice;2020-12-28

3. Assessing the Comparability of Paper and Electronic Versions of the EORTC QOL Module for Head and Neck Cancer: A Qualitative Study;JMIR Cancer;2017-05-12

4. Applying Rasch analysis to evaluate measurement equivalence of different administration formats of the Activity Limitation scale of the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR);Health and Quality of Life Outcomes;2016-04-09

5. Considerations for Requiring Subjects to Provide a Response to Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments;Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science;2015-11