Contingent valuation: Flawed logic?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Contingent valuation: Flawed logic?

Published:2017-07-28 Issue:6349 Volume:357 Page:363-363
ISSN:0036-8075
Container-title:Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Science

Author:

Baron Jonathan¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference5 articles.

1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Final Programmatic Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan and Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (NOAA for the Deepwater Horizon Natural Resource Damage Assessment Trustees, 2016), chap. 5.

2. Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction

3. Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?

4. Stated Willingness to Pay for Public Goods: A Psychological Perspective

5. Determinants of insensitivity to quantity in valuation of public goods: Contribution, warm glow, budget constraints, availability, and prominence.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Estimating farmers’ willingness to pay for photovoltaic industry to improve agricultural green resources and environment;Frontiers in Environmental Science;2022-11-18

2. Inadequate Standards in the Valuation of Public Goods and Ecosystem Services: Why Economists, Environmental Scientists and Policymakers Should Care;Sustainability;2021-01-04

3. Beyond Current Guidelines: A Proposal for Bringing Behavioral Economics to the Design and Analysis of Stated Preference Surveys;Ecological Economics;2020-10

4. Scope Effects in Contingent Valuation: Does the Assumed Statistical Distribution of WTP Matter?;Ecological Economics;2018-02

5. On Scope Effects in Contingent Valuation: Does the Statistical Distributional Assumption Matter?;SSRN Electronic Journal;2015