Affiliation:
1. The author is in the Department of Zoology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Abstract
REVIEW
Recent approaches to analyzing the evolution of female mating preferences emphasize how historical influences on female receiver systems can bias the evolution of male traits that females find attractive. These studies combine animal behavior, sensory biology, phylogenetics, and artificial neural network models. They attempt to understand why specific phenotypes involved in sexual selection have evolved, rather than merely determining whether such traits and preferences are adaptive. It is now clear that traits and preferences often do not coevolve via genetic correlations, that female mating preferences for a given male trait are influenced by adaptations and constraints outside of the context of female responses to that particular trait, and that receiver biases can explain much of the diversity in male signaling phenotypes. It also appears that an understanding of historical effects will prove valuable in investigating why neural and cognitive systems respond to sensory stimuli as they do.
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Reference60 articles.
1. Recent reviews of sexual selection and female choice include
2. Kirkpatrick M., Ryan M. J., Nature 350, 33 (1991);
3. ; M. Andersson Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ. Press Princeton NJ 1994);
4. Phylogenetic tests of the sensory exploitation model of sexual selection
5. ; M. J. Ryan in Behavioural Ecology An Evolutionary Approach J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies Eds. (Blackwell Oxford 1997) pp. 179–202.
Cited by
340 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献