Combining Sensory Information: Mandatory Fusion Within, but Not Between, Senses

Author:

Hillis J. M.1,Ernst M. O.2,Banks M. S.13,Landy M. S.4

Affiliation:

1. Vision Science Program, School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720–2020, USA.

2. Max-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstraβe 38, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

3. Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720–1650, USA.

4. Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA.

Abstract

Humans use multiple sources of sensory information to estimate environmental properties. For example, the eyes and hands both provide relevant information about an object's shape. The eyes estimate shape using binocular disparity, perspective projection, etc. The hands supply haptic shape information by means of tactile and proprioceptive cues. Combining information across cues can improve estimation of object properties but may come at a cost: loss of single-cue information. We report that single-cue information is indeed lost when cues from within the same sensory modality (disparity and texture gradients in vision) are combined, but not when different modalities (vision and haptics) are combined.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference20 articles.

1. Our interest is in the manner in which the nervous system resolves discrepancies at any given moment between sensory measurements. We assume the sensory systems under examination are well calibrated so their signals will on average agree with one another. They will however disagree from one measurement to the next due to random measurement error.

2. J. J. Clark A. L. Yuille Data Fusion for Sensory Information Systems (Kluwer Academic Boston MA 1990).

3. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion

4. Z. Ghahramani D. M. Wolpert M. I. Jordan in Self-Organization Computational Maps and Motor Control P. G. Morasso V. Sanguineti Eds. (Elsevier Amsterdam 1997) pp. 117–147.

5. Ernst M. O., Banks M. S., Nature 451, 429 (2002).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3