WHO Ranking of Health System Performance

Author:

Jamison Dean T.1,Sandbu Martin E.2

Affiliation:

1. D. T. Jamison is with the Program on Global Health and Education, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

2. M. E. Sandbu is in the Center for International Development, The Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference15 articles.

1. WHO World Health Report 2000—Health Systems: Improving Performance (World Health Organization Geneva 2000).

2. WHR2000 provides rankings of health systems with respect both to health (disability-adjusted life expectancies or DALEs) and overall performance. Overall performance combines measures of attainment not only on health but also on aspects of finance responsiveness and distribution. This policy forum discusses performance with respect to health but the same issues arise concerning overall performance. For a critical discussion of the content and construction of all these measures see A. Williams Health Econ. 10 93 (2001.

3. WHO World Health Report 1999: Making a Difference (World Health Organization Geneva 1999). Its Annex table 6 reports country performance relative to income between 1952 and 1992 on infant mortality rate and female life expectancy. One author of this policy forum (D.T.J.) was the lead author of WHR 1999.

4. Similar analysis is possible at the level of hospitals rather than countries. California for example assessed performance differences in management of acute myocardial infarction relative to variables that control for the complexity of the case mix presenting at the hospital. [See H. S. Luft P. S. Romano Principal Investigators Second Report of the California Hospital Outcomes Project vols. 1 and 2 (California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development 1996). Hospitals differed markedly in risk-adjusted performance.

5. The percentiles refer to the countries' WHR1999 and WHR2000 ranks respectively relative to the subset of countries included in both rankings. WHR1999 used level of female life expectancy in 1992 as its outcome measure whereas WHR2000 used DALE in 1997. Data on life expectancy and DALE are virtually perfectly correlated so use of DALEs imposes the cost of lower transparency for virtually no gain and in particular this is not a source of difference between the WHR2000 and the WHR1999 rankings. (Female life expectancy in 1992 has a 0.95 correlation with DALEs in 1997.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3