Abstract
Researchers have pointed out that rhetorical strategies have a significant impact on producing humour in Chinese talk shows, while few of them have investigated the factors that affect the rhetorical choice in humorous discourse in that context. This study aims to identify the rhetorical strategies used in humorous discourse and investigate the factors that impact on the rhetorical strategies chosen by the hosts or comedians to produce humour. Thus, the current study selected 24 monologue samples from a popular programme called Rock & Roast and conducted a discourse analysis on them. Kenneth Burke’s rhetorical theory is adopted to uncover the factors that influence rhetorical choice in the humorous discourse of Chinese talk shows. The findings reveal that the realisation of rhetorical strategies in the humorous discourse of talk shows is rich, including rhetorical devices, foreign language (English), and internet buzzwords, among other things. The main factors influencing the rhetorical strategies chosen in the humorous discourse in Chinese talk shows are the ‘ratio’ of ‘agent and agency,' which are talk show comedians and the Chinese language. This study contributes to helping the audience gain a better understanding of rhetorical humour in Chinese talk shows and provides a new perspective for humorous discourse analysis.
Publisher
Estonian Literary Museum Scholarly Press
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Applied Psychology,Communication,Language and Linguistics,Cultural Studies
Reference36 articles.
1. Alvesson, M. & Kärreman, D. (2011). ‘Decolonializing discourse: critical reflections on organizational discourse analysis’. Human Relations 64 (9), pp. 1121-1146.
2. Aristotle (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, trans. W. Rhys Roberts. ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3. Aristotle (2004). Rhetoric. trans. W. Rhys Roberts. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
4. Aytan, A., Aynur, B., Hila, P., Aytac, E. & Malahat, A. (2021). ‘Euphemisms and dysphemisms as language means implementing rhetorical strategies in political discourse’. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 17 (2), pp. 741–754.
5. Burke, K. (1945). A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献