Development of a set of priority measures for the integration of tools for assessing working conditions for the formation of occupational risk levels

Author:

Bukhtiyarov Igor V.1ORCID,Kuzmina Lyudmila P.1ORCID,Golovkova Nina P.1ORCID,Izmerova Natalya I.1ORCID,Leskina Lyudmila M.1ORCID,Kotova Natalya I.1ORCID,Sobolev Vasiliy P.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health

2. I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Abstract

Introduction. The increase in life expectancy, a decrease in mortality rates of the working-age population requires the development of a set of priority measures and justification of their effectiveness in the occupational risk management system based on the transition to a personalized assessment of working conditions and the health status of employees. The study aims to develop a set of priority measures to integrate tools for assessing working conditions and to justify their effectiveness in the occupational risk management system to determine the levels and groups of occupational risks in the workplace, depending on the complex of harmful and/or dangerous factors of the production environment and the labor process and the health status of employees. Materials and methods. The researchers have conducted the analysis of qualitative and quantitative indicators of occupational risk, including indicators of health disorders of employees. We have analyzed the materials of periodic medical examinations to substantiate the algorithm for the formation of risk groups for the development of occupational diseases. Scientists have performed a cross-epidemiological study to assess the risk of developing chronic general somatic diseases in workers. We have calculated the indicators of the total risk of fatal cardiovascular diseases. Experts have studied the features of the current situation with indicators of occupational morbidity in the Russian Federation. Results. There are two groups of qualitative and quantitative indicators at the level of state supervision and enterprise, which allow assessing the effectiveness of the risk management system. Scientists have identified qualitative and quantitative indicators for early detection of violations in the employee's body from the effects of production factors. We have substantiated the algorithm and criteria for the formation of risk groups for the development of occupational diseases. Assessment of the risk of developing general somatic diseases in workers with constant exposure to high levels of harmful factors: vibration, severity and labor intensity, showed a high prevalence and increased risk of diseases of the endocrine, musculoskeletal and circulatory systems, as well as a significant increase in these indicators with an increase in work experience in harmful working conditions, which allows us to consider these diseases as production-related diseases. Individuals with endocrine diseases are significantly more likely to have a very high, high and medium overall risk of developing fatal cardiovascular diseases (CVD). With an increase in work experience, the percentage of people at high risk of developing fatal CVD increased. The level of occupational morbidity calculated for the number of employees employed in harmful working conditions is 32% higher than the indicator calculated for all employees of the enterprise. A similar recalculation of occupational morbidity indicators for individual nosologies also completely changes the picture. Conclusion. We have substantiated the necessity of transition to a personalized assessment of occupational risk among employees. Researchers have developed proposals for adjusting legislation in order to integrate tools for assessing working conditions and improving the effectiveness of the occupational risk management system. Ethics. This study did not require the conclusion of the Ethics committee.

Publisher

FSBI Research Institute of Occupational Health RAMS

Subject

General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Levashov S.P. Occupational safety and health monitoring systems in Russia and the countries of the European Union. Bezopasnost’ v tekhnosfere. 2013; 1: 44–52.

2. Malayan K.R., Milokhov V.V., Minko V.M., Rusak O.N., etc. Special assessment of working conditions: a critical analysis. Bezopasnost’ zhiznedeyatel’nosti. 2014; 12: 3–16.

3. Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation No. 33n dated 24.01.2014 «On approval of the methodology for conducting a special assessment of working conditions, a Classifier of harmful and(or) hazardous production factors, a report form on conducting a special assessment of working conditions and instructions for completing it.

4. Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation No. 24n dated January 20, 2015 «On Amendments to the Methodology for Conducting a Special assessment of Working Conditions and the Classifier of Harmful and (or) Hazardous Production Factors Approved by Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation No. 33n dated January 24, 2014.

5. Prokopenko L.V., Golovkova N.P., Kotova N.I., Mikhailova N.S., Chebotarev A.G. The relevance of improving the methodology for conducting a special assessment of working conditions to establish the level of occupational risk among employees. Aktual’nye problemy meditsiny truda. Sbornik trudov Instituta. Saratov: Amirit LLC; 2018: 302–10.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Priority directions for preserving the health of underground coal mining workers;Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology;2023-12-29

2. Design of a prognostic model for assessing the risk of developing asbestosis based on the results of molecular genetic studies;Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology;2023-12-29

3. Leading Risk Factors for Diseases of the Circulatory and Musculoskeletal Systems in Metallurgical Workers;ЗДОРОВЬЕ НАСЕЛЕНИЯ И СРЕДА ОБИТАНИЯ - ЗНиСО / PUBLIC HEALTH AND LIFE ENVIRONMENT;2023-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3