Affiliation:
1. Izmerov Research Institute of Occupation Health
Abstract
Introduction. Objective assessment of the noise redaction (NR) of individual hearing protection devices (HDP) in industrial conditions is actual problem despite numerous studies in this direction in many countries. This study aimed to implement the F-MIRE method for measuring the NR of HDPs, considering the transfer function of the outer ear. Materials and methods. HDP performance indicators measured by the real ear attenuation threshold (REAT) method in the free field, do not fully reflect the protective properties of HDP in specific production conditions and for a specific employee, according to many researchers. The measurement method using two microphones, called Field-MIRE (F-MIRE), allows you to determine NR as the difference in sound pressure, external noise and noise inside the external auditory meatus (EAM). But since these microphones are located in different acoustic conditions, it becomes necessary use at least two blocks of correction coefficients to get real results. One block - considering the properties of the acoustic probe, the second - should consider the transfer function of open ear. The measurements of the TFOE in 18 volunteers and the evaluation of the NR of the SOMZ-1 "Jaguar" earmuff in industrial conditions were carried out. Results. This study has shown the effectiveness of the implementation of the F-MIRE method for an adequate assessment of the NR of earmuff in industrial conditions. The special headband uses for measuring the TFOE allows you to standardize the location of measuring microphones relative to the volunteer's head and reduce the uncertainty of measurements. Unlike the REAT method with binaural listening in a free field, the F-MIRE method allows you to determine the TFOE for each ear of an employee. Our research has shown that TFOE differences between the right and left ears one-man can be significant. Conclusion. The NR determination by the difference of sound pressures measured by an external microphone and a MIRE microphone, without considering the acoustic properties of the outer ear underestimates both spectral and single-digit NR indicators.
Publisher
FSBI Research Institute of Occupational Health RAMS
Reference20 articles.
1. Behar A. Field evaluation of hearing protectors. Noise Control Eng J. 1985; 24: 13-7.
2. Berger E.H., Franks J.R., Lindgren F., Axelsson A., Borchgrevink H., Hamernik R.P., Hellstrom L., Henderson D., Salvi R.J. Chapter 29 - international review of field studies of hearing protector attenuation, Scientific basis of noise-induced hearing loss. 1996, New-York, NY Thieme Medical Publisher: 361-77.
3. Casali J.G., Park M.-Y. Attenuation of four hearing protectors under dynamic movement and different user fitting conditions. Hum factors. 1990; 32: 9-25.
4. Nélisse H., Gaudreau M-A, Boutin J., Voix J., Laville F. Measurement of Hearing Protection Devices Performance in the Workplace during Full-Shift Working Operations. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 2012; 56(2): 221-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mer087
5. Berger E.H. Hearing protector performance: how they work - and - what goes wrong in the real world. 1980 E-A-RLog Series of Technical Monographs on Hearing and Hearing Protection. Indianapolis, IN: 3M Company: 1-4.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献