1. Cetin, K. O. and Bilge, H. T. (2012): Cyclic large strain and induced pore pressure models for saturated clean sands, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 138(3), 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000631.
2. Choi, Y. and Kumar, K. (2023): A machine learning approach to predicting pore pressure response in liquefiable sands under cyclic loading. In Geo-Congress 2023 (pp. 202-210). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484692.021.
3. Dobry, R., Ladd, R. S., Yokel, F. Y., Chung, R. M. and Powell, D. (1982): Prediction of Pore Water Pressure Buildup and Liquefaction of Sands During Earthquakes by the Cyclic Strain Method. National Bureau of Standards, US Department of Commerce, US Governmental Printing Office, Building Science Series, Washington.
4. ElGhoraiby, M. and Manzari, M. (2018): "LEAP-2018 - Stress-strain response of Ottawa F65 sand in Cyclic Simple Shear", in LEAP-2018 - Stress-strain response of Ottawa F65 sand in Cyclic Simple Shear. DesignSafe-CI. https://doi.org/10.17603/DS2HX3H.
5. Green, R. A., Mitchell, J. K. and Polito, C. P. (2000): An energy-based excess pore-water pressure generation model for cohesionless soils. Proc., John Booker Memorial Symp.—Developments in Theoretical Geomechanics, D. W. Smith and J. P. Carter, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 383–390.