1. 1) Anderson, J. G. (2004). Quantitative measure of the goodness-of-fit of synthetic seismograms. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 243.
2. 2) Byrne, P. M., Park, S. S., & Beaty, M. (2003). Seismic liquefaction: centrifuge and numerical modeling. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 3rd International FLAC Symposium, Sudbury,
3. 3) Dugan, B., Flemings, P., Rack, F., Bohrmann, G., Trehu, A., & Schroeder, D. (2003). Measuring pore pressure in marine sediments with penetrometers: Comparison of the piezoprobe and DVTP-P Tools in ODP Leg 204. Research Papers of the Link Foundation Fellows, 3, 179-199.
4. 4) Hartzell, S. (1982). Simulation of ground accelerations for the May 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California, earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 72(6A), 2381-2387.
5. 5) Jiang, C., & Wotherspoon, L. (Oct, 2022). Comparison between four quantitative goodness-of-fit criteria for acceleration time series. Paper presented at the