Popular conceptions of democracy in a mathematics teacher-education programme

Author:

Olawale Babawande Emmanuel1ORCID,Mncube Vusi1ORCID,Harber Clive2

Affiliation:

1. School of Further and Continuing Education, Faculty of Education, University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa

2. School of Education, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Abstract

While the meaning of democracy remains multi-faceted centuries after the concept was first conceived of and subsequently formulated, democratic principles have spread to the extent of bringing about democratisation in all fields of education. Thus, with this study we sought to examine the popular conception of democracy in mathematics-education programmes at South African universities. A qualitative research approach and a case study research design were used in this study. Six mathematics teacher educators and 75 second- to fourth-year mathematics education student teachers from 3 different universities constitute the sample for the study. The findings from the study revealed that participants had a contested notion of democracy, since the majority understood it as involving deliberative participation, a shared decision-making process, as well as freedom of expression. Based on the findings of the study, it was concluded that participants were aware of what democracy should look like and were willing to live according to democratic tenets. This understanding was, however, greatly influenced by their experiences and way of life in a democratic South Africa.

Publisher

Education Association of South Africa

Subject

Education

Reference122 articles.

1. Acemoglu D, Naidu S, Restrepo P & Robinson JA 2019. Democracy does cause growth. Journal of Political Economy, 127(1):47–100. https://doi.org/10.1086/700936

2. Agyemang B 2012. Democratic education for social improvement: An exploration of the views of pupils and teacher trainees in Ghana. PhD thesis. Birmingham, England: University of Birmingham. Available at https://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/4147/1/Agyemang13PhD.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2023.

3. Alshurman M 2015. Democratic education and administration. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176:861–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.551

4. Anderson T 2013. Research paradigms: Ontology’s, epistemologies & methods [PowerPoint presentation]. Available at https://www.slideshare.net/eLearnCenter/research-methods-uoc-2013. Accessed 24 August 2020.

5. Apple MW 1988. Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York, NY: Routledge.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3