Capturing classroom practice using a mixed methods design

Author:

Steinke Kellie1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Social Sciences, BA Faculty, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela, South Africa

Abstract

In this article I focus on the use of mixed methods in designing a classroom observation instrument known as the Facilitative Orientation to Reading Teaching (FORT). The instrument was designed to capture the teaching of reading and formed part of a project that took place in 2 Kwa-Zulu Natal primary schools. Participants were 8 teachers and their learners. The goal was to investigate how a teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge can affect the literacy acquisition of Foundation and Intermediate Phase learners. In the study reported on here I used a facilitative-restrictive teaching and learning model based on the theories of, among others, Bernstein and Vygotsky, as well as Scarborough’s Reading Rope theory. The instrument design was based on an original classroom instrument that captured only quantitative data. Through the addition of qualitative data, the instrument could capture classroom practice more accurately. Findings indicate that, ultimately, 1 of the participating teachers appeared to be successfully leading their learners from decoding to comprehension across the important Grade 3 to 4 threshold, where learners are expected to move from learning to read to be being able to learn from reading.

Publisher

Education Association of South Africa

Reference55 articles.

1. Alasuutari P, Bickman L & Brannen J (eds.) 2008. The Sage handbook of social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

2. Bernstein B 1990. Class, codes and control (Vol. IV). London, England: Routledge.

3. Bernstein B 1999. Official knowledge and pedagogic identities. In F Christie (ed). Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes. London, England: Continuum.

4. Bruner JS 1971. The relevance of education. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

5. Burton D & Bartlett S 2009. Key issues for education researchers. London, England: Sage.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3