Making psychology “count”: On the mathematization of psychology

Author:

Nuttgens Simon

Abstract

Beginning in the late 18th century and continuing through to the mid-20th century, a movement was undertaken by psychology’s pioneers to establish a mathematical basis for research modeled after the physical sciences. It is argued that this movement arose through sociopolitical pressures to legitimize psychology as an independent discipline; demarcate its disciplinary boundaries within academia; and distinguish psychology from philosophy and spiritualism. It is argued that an ahistorical view of how the quantitative paradigm gained ascendancy leaves it largely unquestioned and unchallenged within mainstream psychology. Because of this, qualitative research has endured a long and continuing struggle to gain disciplinary recognition and epistemological parity. It is proposed that despite being sidelined by decades of quantitative hegemony, qualitative research has a long history in psychology and in the last 40 years has continued to prove itself as a necessary and valuable contributor to research in psychology.

Publisher

Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)

Subject

General Psychology

Reference51 articles.

1. The Crisis in Psychology

2. Benjamin, L. T. (1997). Wilhelm Wundt: The American connection. In W. G. Bringmann, H. E. Lück, R. Miller & C. E. Early (Eds.), A pictorial history of psychology (pp. 140–147). Quintessence.

3. Blumenthal, A. L. (2002). A reappraisal of Wilhelm Wundt. In W. E. Pickren & D. A. Dewsbury (Eds.), Evolving perspectives on the history of psychology (pp. 65–78). American Psychological Association.

4. Boring, E. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). Appleton-Century-Croft.

5. Brinkmann, S., Jacobsen, M. H., & Kristiansen, S. (2014). Historical overview of qualitative research in the social science. In P. Leavy (Ed.), Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 17–42). Oxford University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3