Guidelines for the revision and use of revised psychological tests: A systematic review study

Author:

Cronje Johan H.ORCID,Watson Mark B.ORCID,Stroud Louise-AnneORCID

Abstract

Tests are updated and revised periodically in order to remain current, valid and reliable in a competitive psychological testing industry. Despite the prevalence of test revisions, especially in recent years, a number of authors have commented on the lack of comprehensive guidelines for test revision. Whilst some guideline documents from test associations have mentioned test revision, these guidelines tend to be focussed on test user responsibility, with limited guidance for practitioners embarking on a test revision project. Test revision is expensive and time consuming, leaving little scope for experimentation or trial-and-error. Test revision deserves a comprehensive document that addresses aspects such as what the different types of revision are, when to embark on a revision, what process to follow and how test users should use revised tests. The current study developed a comprehensive and practical set of 23 guidelines across ten phases of a revision project to assist revision teams, test users and publishers. These guidelines were peer-reviewed and refined.

Publisher

Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)

Subject

General Psychology

Reference26 articles.

1. Practical and ethical issues pertaining to test revisions.

2. American Educational Research Association. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA.

3. American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. APA. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/

4. Determining Whether Or When To Adopt New Versions Of Psychological And Neuropsychological Tests: Ethical And Professional Considerations

5. Revising psychological tests: Lessons learned from the revision of the MMPI.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3