The illusion of knowing in metacognitive monitoring: Effects of the type of information and of personal, cognitive, metacognitive, and individual psychological characteristics

Author:

Avhustiuk Maria Mykolaivna,Pasichnyk Ihor Demydovych,Kalamazh Ruslana Volodymyrivna

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to analyse the illusion of knowing in metacognitive monitoring of the learning activity of university students (n = 262). The analysis focuses on the effects of the different types of information proposed and of personal, cognitive, metacognitive, and individual psychological characteristics of the participants. The research has shown that the illusion of knowing can occur in all types of metacognitive judgments, but is more evident in prospective judgments and depends on the type of information, its length and style, task type, etc. There are empirically established correlations between the selected personal, cognitive, and metacognitive characteristics. Gender and age differences in the manifestation of the illusion of knowing are not observed, although it is found that women tend towards overconfidence. The results also showed that the illusion of knowing is more typical for younger students, especially for those with lower levels of academic achievements.

Publisher

Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)

Subject

General Psychology

Reference88 articles.

1. Avhustiuk, M. M. (2016). Iliuzia znannia v metakohnityvnomu monitorynhu navchalnoi dialnosti studentiv vnz [The illusion of knowing in metacognitive monitoring of the educational activity of university students] (Unpublished doctoral thesis). National University of Ostroh Academy, Ostroh, Ukraine.

2. The Illusory-Knowledge Effect

3. The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index.

4. Attention and performance XVII: cognitive regulation of performance: interaction of theory and application. D. Gopher and A. Koriat (eds). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999. ISBN 0-262-07188-6. Price $95

5. Do students effectively monitor their comprehension?;Bradshaw;Reading Horizons,2000

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3