Sibling Relation, Ethnic Prejudice, Direct and Indirect Contact: There is a Connection?

Author:

Alfieri Sara,Marta Elena

Abstract

The literature on the socialisation of prejudice has concentrated on “vertical” processes (from parents to children), ignoring siblings’ contribution. This work aims to investigate the effect of contact (direct or indirect) with the outgroup that young people experience a) directly or b) indirectly through older or younger siblings’ friendships. Our hypotheses are a) that young people with friends in the outgroup will report lower prejudice levels (direct contact), as will young people who have older or younger siblings with friends in the outgroup (indirect contact); b) that other forms of contact such as having classmates/coworkers, neighbours, or employees are not effective in reducing either direct or indirect prejudice. 88 sibling dyads were administered the blatant and subtle prejudice questionnaire (Pettigrew & Meertens, 1995) and some ad hoc items aimed at investigating the typology of the contact experienced. The analysis of mixed ANOVA reveals that the first hypothesis was partially confirmed in that prejudice (subtle for the younger sibling and blatant for the older one) decreases in a statistically significant way only when there is the co-presence of direct and indirect contact. The second hypothesis is fully confirmed as no statistically significant differences emerged between the groups.

Publisher

Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)

Subject

General Psychology

Reference38 articles.

1. “Do Not Leave Your Values at Home”: A Study of Value Orientations of Italian Emerging Adults and Their Parents

2. Family and social generation compared in terms of ethnic prejudice in young adults.;Alfieri;TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology,2012

3. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.

4. Arcuri, L., & Boca, S. (1996). Pregiudizio e affiliazione politica: Destra e sinistra di fronte all’immigrazione del terzo mondo in Psicologia e Politica [Prejudice and political affiliation: Left and right in front of the Third World immigration in psychology and political science]. In P. Legrenzi & V. Girotto (Eds.), Psicologia e Politica [Psychology and political science] (pp. 241-274). Milano, Italy: Raffaello Cortina Editore.

5. Arcuri, L., & Zogmaister, C. (2007). Metodi di ricerca nella cognizione sociale [Research methods in social cognition]. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3