Surprising implications of differences in locations versus differences in means

Author:

Trafimow DavidORCID,Roth Nathaniel,Xu Lina,Toomasian Deborah,Perrello Audrey,Tong Tingting,Wang Tonghui,Choy S. T. Boris,Chen Xiangfei,Wang Cong,Hu Liqun

Abstract

Social science researchers depend on differences in means between experimental and control conditions to draw substantive conclusions. However, an alternative is to use differences in locations. For normal distributions, means and locations are the same, but for skew normal distributions, means and locations are different. If a difference in means and locations are similar, and in the same direction, the resulting substantive story may be similar. However, if a difference in means and locations are dissimilar, especially if they oppose directionally, the resulting substantive story may differ dramatically. We collected 51 data sets from online data repositories to check how often the differences in means versus locations are substantially different or are in different directions. Although the values depend on what one counts, the overall conclusion is that the two types of differences have a larger than trivial chance of disagreeing substantially. We suggest that when researchers report normal statistics (mean and standard deviation), they should report skew normal statistics (location, scale, and shape) too, against the nontrivial chance that the skew normal statistics imply a substantive story in opposition to that implied by the normal statistics.

Publisher

Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)

Subject

General Psychology,General Social Sciences

Reference27 articles.

1. Azjen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.

2. A class of distributions which includes the normal ones.;Scandinavian Journal of Statistics,1985

3. Azzalini, A. (2014). The skew-normal and related families (Vol. 3). Cambridge University Press.

4. Statistical applications of the multivariate skew normal distribution

5. Skewness and Kurtosis in Real Data Samples

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3