Incorporating hope and resilience into policy and program evaluation: Empirical evidence from Australia

Author:

Burgess Simon1,Fazal-e-Hasan Syed Muhammad2,Abid Muhammad3,Dillon Anthony2,Farooque Omar Al1,Adapa Sujana1

Affiliation:

1. University of New England, Australia

2. Australian Catholic University

3. University of New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

In discussions about the goals we should set for our policies and programs, there are some familiar moral reasons to think that hope and resilience should often be included. In particular, hope and resilience are both widely recognized as moral virtues, and they may be vital for social cohesion. To demonstrate the feasibility of modelling and measuring the relevant variables and of putting them to use, we developed and tested a number of hypotheses. Drawing upon survey data that we collected from 429 participants (211 Indigenous Australians and 218 non-Indigenous Australians'), we found that favourable beliefs about the quality of government support are positively associated with greater levels of hope and resilience. Hope and resilience, in turn, are positively associated with greater satisfaction with life. But most interestingly, we found a strong and widespread positive association between fully recognizing the legacy of historical injustices in Australia and having hope. Points for practitioners: • It is feasible to adopt hope and resilience as goals for policies and programs, and to evaluate policies and programs accordingly. Moreover, as indicated here, doing so can provide some interesting results.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference104 articles.

1. ABS. (2017). 2071.0 - Census of Population and Housing: Reflecting Australia - Stories from the Census, 2016. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/2071.0∼2016∼Main%20Features∼Cultural%20Diversity%20Article∼60

2. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.

3. Aristotle. (1885). The Politics of Aristotle. Translated by B. Jowett. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

4. Nicomachean Ethics

5. Australian Government. (2009). Closing the Gap on Indigenous Disadvantage: The Challenge for Australia. https://www.closingthegap.gov.au/previous-reports

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3