Group relations love: sentience and group relations work - Part II-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Group relations love: sentience and group relations work - Part II

Published:2019-11-01 Issue:2 Volume:19 Page:200-217
ISSN:2044-3765
Container-title:Organisational and Social Dynamics
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Short Ellen L.

Abstract

Part II of this article will provide a focus on sentience and group relations work through the narratives of individuals who responded to a questionnaire about their lived experiences of group relations conference work. Formulated meanings, themes, and theme clusters of the respondents’ narratives will be presented and explored using application of phenomenological analyses. Group relations love and the possibility of love of, and for, group work will be more deeply explored. A discussion and implications for group relations work will also be presented.

Publisher

Phoenix Publishing House Ltd

Subject

Social Psychology

Reference12 articles.

1. Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from Experience. London: Karnac, 1984.

2. Gertler, B., & Hayden, C. (2015). Uneasy on the boundary: reflections on the culture and effectiveness of group relations conference work in the USA, 1965–2012. In: E. Aram, R. Baxter, & A. Nutkevitch (Eds.), Group Relations Work: Exploring the Impact and Relevance Within and Beyond its Network (pp. 139–159). London: Karnac.

3. Gertler, B., & Izod, K. (2004). Modernism and postmodernism in group relations: “A confusion of tongues.” In: S. Cytrynbaum & D. A. Noumair (Eds.), Group Dynamics, Organizational Irrationality, and Social Complexity: Group Relations Reader 3 (pp. 81–98). Jupiter, FL: A. K. Rice Institute.

4. hooks, b. (2000). All About Love: New Visions. New York: William Morrow.

5. Jacobus, M. (2005). The Poetics of Psychoanalysis in the Wake of Klein. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.