Unraveling the Electrophysiological Activity Behind Recognition Memory

Abstract

Abstract. Traditionally, most event related potential (ERP) studies of memory retrieval have been reported during item-recognition tasks. Those studies lead to two well-known ERP memory components termed FN400 (familiarity) and LPC (recollection). Nevertheless, some critics have raised concerns regarding the actual meaning of that activity since it emerges as the result of contrasting two different memory traces (previously studied vs. seen for the first time), and it is registered after the target presentation. Therefore, they possibly depict operations not related to memory itself but some cognitive processes associated with recognition memory. Based on those critics, we propose an innovative approach to study electrophysiological activity underlying recognition memory. We compared two very similar tasks with only one of them requiring subjects to actively retrieve a “cue-target” pair of visual stimuli from memory, while the other task required subjects to recognize the target stimulus as equal/different to the cue. Because of this experimental manipulation, we assured that active memory retrieval processes take place between the presentation of the cue and the target stimuli for only one of the tasks. As a result, responses upon the targets can give us valuable information regarding ERP components associated with recognition based on memory retrieval. We found three components possibly related to brain computations necessary to achieve correct target recognition. A N200-like component linked to executive functions (inhibition) from frontal cortices, a P300-like component, related to the expectation of the target stimulus, and a P600-like component associated to recognition based on LTM retrieval. These results help us to understand the complexity behind ERP components associated with recognition memory.