Defining and Evaluating Fidelity at the Program Level in Psychosocial Treatments

Author:

Brunk Molly A.1,Chapman Jason E.2,Schoenwald Sonja K.2

Affiliation:

1. MST Institute, Mt. Pleasant, SC, USA

2. Family Services Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

Abstract

One challenge to research on the implementation of effective psychosocial treatments is how to define and measure fidelity at the program level. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an approach to defining, measuring, and observing over time fidelity at the program level for Multisystemic Therapy (MST). For this study, program fidelity was conceptualized as a program’s performance on several key areas identified in the literature as contributing to sustainability. A composite index, the MST Program Performance Index (PPI), was developed using data from the MST quality assurance system. The PPI included indicators of treatment adherence, treatment completion, program operations, program capacity, clinical supervisor leadership, and stakeholder relationships. A PPI score was calculated for 496 MST teams every 6 months for a two year period, during which time, the teams served over 25,000 young people. The predictive validity of the PPI score was supported by both client- and team-level outcomes. Specifically, youth treated by teams with lower PPI scores were more likely to be rearrested during their course of treatment. Likewise, teams with lower PPI scores were more likely to close during the time period covered by the study. Analysis of scores over the two year period showed substantial within-team variability in the PPI; however, the scores did not follow a linear pattern of change. In summary, preliminary evidence suggests the PPI may be a useful tool to index program-level fidelity for comparative purposes and as an additional tool for a decision support system.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3