Affiliation:
1. University of Canberra
2. University of Melbourne, Australia
Abstract
Summary: The body of evidence suggests that there is a causal association between nonfictional media reporting of suicide (in newspapers, on television, and in books) and actual suicide, and that there may be one between fictional media portrayal (in film and television, in music, and in plays) and actual suicide. This finding has been explained by social learning theory. The majority of studies upon which this finding is based fall into the media “effects tradition,” which has been criticized for its positivist-like approach that fails to take into account of media content or the capacity of audiences to make meaning out of messages. A cultural studies approach that relies on discourse and frame analyses to explore meanings, and that qualitatively examines the multiple meanings that audiences give to media messages, could complement the effects tradition. Together, these approaches have the potential to clarify the notion of what constitutes responsible reporting of suicide, and to broaden the framework for evaluating media performance.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference63 articles.
1. Alasuutari, P (1999). Rethinking the media audience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
2. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.
3. Bandura, A (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
4. Same Time, Next Year: Aggregate Analyses of the Mass Media and Violent Behavior
5. Beck, U (1992). Risk society: Toward a new modernity (trans. M Ritter). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Cited by
59 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献