Specific Psychological Treatment Versus Treatment as Usual in Adolescents with Self-Harm

Author:

Ougrin Dennis1,Latif Saqib2

Affiliation:

1. King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, London, UK

2. South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Abstract

Background: Despite recent advances in the understanding and treatment of self-harm, poor engagement with therapy remains a serious problem. Aims: To investigate whether offering specific psychological treatment (SPT) leads to better engagement than offering treatment as usual (TAU) in adolescents who have self-harmed. Methods: Data sources were identified by searching Medline, PsychINFO, EMBASE, and PubMed for randomized controlled trials comparing SPT versus TAU in adolescents presenting with self-harm. Results: Seven studies met inclusion criteria, and six were entered into the meta-analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between the number of subjects not completing four or more sessions of an SPT (27.7%, 70/253) than TAU (43.3%, 106/245), RR = 0.71 (95% CI: 0.49–1.05). Conclusions: Engaging adolescents with psychological treatment is necessary although not sufficient to achieve treatment goals. Further research is needed to develop tools for maximizing engagement.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference44 articles.

1. Asarnow, J. R. (2009a). Effectiveness of a family-based intervention for adolescent suicide attempters (The SAFETY Study). Retrieved from clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00692302

2. Asarnow, J. R. (2009b). Family Intervention for Suicidal Youth: Emergency Care (FISP). Retrieved from clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00558805?term=asarnow&rank=3

3. Evaluating the SOSsuicide prevention program: a replication and extension

4. Repeated self-poisoning: increasing severity of self-harm as a predictor of subsequent suicide

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3