Psychiatric Patient Disposition Agreement Between the Emergency Physician and the Psychiatry Consultant

Author:

Chakravarthy Bharath1,Menchine Michael2,Thompson Daniel E.3,Rajeev Sindhya4,Santos Barbara-Jean5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Orange, CA, USA

2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

3. Tampa, FL, USA

4. School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA

5. Kaiser Permanente, Fontana/Ontario, CA, USA

Abstract

Background: Mental illness is prevalent, disabling, and costly. Emergency department (ED) visits for mental health-related reasons are on the increase. Aims: Determine the level of agreement between emergency physicians and psychiatrists regarding psychiatric patient disposition. Method: We conducted a prospective, observational study at a private university hospital ED from October 2008–April 2009 using a convenience sample of patients of all ages with psychiatric complaints who received formal psychiatric consultation during their ED visit. The emergency physician completed a data sheet prior to psychiatric consultation, assessing the likelihood of admission for psychiatric evaluation. We evaluated the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the emergency physician admission decision for all patients before psychiatric consultation, compared with the patients’ actual disposition as determined by the consulting psychiatrist. Results: The study captured 230 subjects, 53% of whom were suicidal patients. 74% of patients were eventually admitted. The emergency physician decision to admit for inpatient psychiatric evaluation had a PPV of 87.3% (CI 81.4–91.9%) and an NPV of 66.7% (CI 52.9–78.6%) compared to the psychiatrist decision for the total sample, and a PPV of 90% (CI 82.4–95.1%) and an NPV of 69.6% (CI 47.1–86.8%) for suicidal patients. Additionally, the κ score, a measure of agreement between emergency physician disposition decision and psychiatrist disposition decision, was 0.530 (Cl 0.404–0.656). 95% of patients with an ED assessment of “definitely admit” were eventually admitted by the psychiatrist. Conclusion: Emergency physician disposition has a high PPV (87.3%) and a moderate NPV (66.7%) compared to psychiatrist disposition.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3