Follow-Up Care Offers and Acceptance in Crisis Line Suicide Prevention Services

Author:

Fulginiti Anthony1ORCID,Doyle Megan1ORCID,Miller Stephen2ORCID,Lee Sae2ORCID,Pasquarella Fred J.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, CO, USA

2. Research and Evaluation Division, Didi Hirsch Mental Health Services, Culver City, CA, USA

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Prior work has explored the impact of follow-up calls in a crisis line context, but no research has investigated the offer and acceptance of follow-up care. Aims: To identify caller/call characteristics associated with whether a caller is offered and accepts follow-up services. Methods: This cross-sectional study included data from 55,594 callers to a member center of the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline (988) between 2017 and 2019. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between caller/call characteristics and two follow-up outcomes. Results: Black callers and those with higher suicide capability and intent had greater odds of being offered and accepting follow-up. Longer call duration was also associated with higher odds of being offered and accepting follow-up. Higher suicidal desire uniquely increased the odds of offers, whereas a higher level of buffers uniquely decreased the odds of offers. Limitations: Data were collected from a single 988-member center and cannot be generalized. Conclusions: That one-third of callers do not accept follow-up highlights the need to understand reasons for not accepting follow-up. That callers with higher risk profiles are offered and accept follow-up at higher rates is reassuring and underscores the benefit of tailoring follow-up interventions for higher-risk callers.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Reference29 articles.

1. Mental health care among blacks in America: Confronting racism and constructing solutions

2. Allison, P. D. (2014). Measures of fit for logistic regression. Proceedings of the SAS Global Forum 2014 Conference (pp. 1–13). SAS Institute.

3. The Experience of Stigma among Black Mental Health Consumers

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3