A Comparative Study Examining the Effects of Mixed and Virtual Reality on Plausibility Illusion and Emotional States

Author:

Shin Mincheol1ORCID,Sibuea Rumittar1ORCID,Lee Heejae2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Communication & Cognition, TSHD, Tilburg University, The Netherlands

2. SI Newhouse School of Public Communications, Syracuse, NY, USA

Abstract

Abstract: Understanding the unique impact of extended reality (XR) technologies, such as virtual reality (VR) and mixed reality (MR), on emotional states is important for predicting users’ subsequent judgments and behaviors. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether and how the differences in the structural affordances of VR and MR (i.e., a sense of being there vs. a sense of an object being in the physical environment) can indeed induce distinct effects. Therefore, the present study aims to elucidate the role of VR and MR technologies on users’ emotional states through the theoretical lens of plausibility illusion. Specifically, we hypothesized that plausibility illusion would mediate the effects of XR modality on emotional states, including arousal and perceived fear toward a fearful object. In addition, we explored the potential moderating role of object virtuality (i.e., ontological characteristic of virtual objects) in the relationship between XR modality and plausibility illusion. Results from a mixed 2 (XR modality: VR vs. MR) × 2 (virtuality: para-authentic vs. artificial) design experiment ( N = 100) showed that VR induced a higher sense of plausibility illusion than MR, which played a mediating role in amplifying arousal and perceived fear. This finding suggests that the differences in the structural affordances of VR and MR can induce distinctive effects on emotional states. Further implications of the findings are discussed.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3