Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science, Research Methods and Psychometrics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
Abstract
Abstract. In this research, the relationship between the number of response categories and the linearity and sensitivity of self-anchoring scales is tested. According to the functional measurement paradigm, people integrate their impressions of stimuli using simple algebraic models. Then the integrated stimulus is transformed into an overt response on a rating scale. The combination of a particular algebraic integration rule along with a linear rating scale predicts specific patterns in a factorial plot. In two functional measurement experiments we manipulated the number of categories of different self-anchoring scales and attempted to replicate a specific pattern based on the integration rules found in previous research. For both experiments, the predicted pattern was observed for all scales. This indicates that the number of response categories does not impact on the linearity of the scale. Moreover, there is no relationship between the number of response categories and the sensitivity of the scale as measured by the F ratio for the main effects.
Subject
General Psychology,General Social Sciences
Reference53 articles.
1. Aiken, L.R. (1996). Rating scales and checklists evaluating behavior, personality, and attitude . New York: Wiley
2. Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation.
3. Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment.
4. Note on functional measurement and data analysis
5. Anderson, N.H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory . London: Academic Press
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Psychometric benefits of self-chosen rating scales over given rating scales;Behavior Research Methods;2024-05-06
2. Self-Anchoring Rating Scale;Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research;2023
3. Intuitive physics and cognitive algebra: A review;European Review of Applied Psychology;2021-09
4. Self-Anchoring Rating Scale;Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research;2021
5. Scaling Sensitive Factorial Survey Analysis;Sociological Methods & Research;2018-10-04