Impact of the Number of Response Categories on Linearity and Sensitivity of Self-Anchoring Scales

Author:

Hofmans Joeri1,Theuns Peter1,Mairesse Olivier1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science, Research Methods and Psychometrics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium

Abstract

Abstract. In this research, the relationship between the number of response categories and the linearity and sensitivity of self-anchoring scales is tested. According to the functional measurement paradigm, people integrate their impressions of stimuli using simple algebraic models. Then the integrated stimulus is transformed into an overt response on a rating scale. The combination of a particular algebraic integration rule along with a linear rating scale predicts specific patterns in a factorial plot. In two functional measurement experiments we manipulated the number of categories of different self-anchoring scales and attempted to replicate a specific pattern based on the integration rules found in previous research. For both experiments, the predicted pattern was observed for all scales. This indicates that the number of response categories does not impact on the linearity of the scale. Moreover, there is no relationship between the number of response categories and the sensitivity of the scale as measured by the F ratio for the main effects.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

General Psychology,General Social Sciences

Reference53 articles.

1. Aiken, L.R. (1996). Rating scales and checklists evaluating behavior, personality, and attitude . New York: Wiley

2. Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation.

3. Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment.

4. Note on functional measurement and data analysis

5. Anderson, N.H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory . London: Academic Press

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Psychometric benefits of self-chosen rating scales over given rating scales;Behavior Research Methods;2024-05-06

2. Self-Anchoring Rating Scale;Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research;2023

3. Intuitive physics and cognitive algebra: A review;European Review of Applied Psychology;2021-09

4. Self-Anchoring Rating Scale;Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research;2021

5. Scaling Sensitive Factorial Survey Analysis;Sociological Methods & Research;2018-10-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3