Challenges and Inequalities of Opportunities in European Psychiatry Research

Author:

Bölte Sven12,Tomalski Przemyslaw3,Marschik Peter B.14,Berggren Steve12,Norberg Joakim1,Falck-Ytter Terje15,Pokorska Olga3,Jones Emily J.H.6,Charman Tony7,Roeyers Herbert8,Kostrzewa Elzbieta1,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

2. KIND, Center for Psychiatry Research, Stockholm County Council, Sweden

3. Neurocognitive Development Lab, Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Poland

4. Institute of Physiology, Center for Physiological Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria

5. Uppsala Child and Babylab, Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden

6. Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK

7. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, UK

8. Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium

Abstract

Abstract. Europe is diverse in terms of economy, cultures, socio-demography, and languages. A crucial aspect of psychiatric research is the availability of standardized screening, diagnostic, and characterization instruments. We fine-mapped the accessibility of 14 clinical scales and cognitive tests for the assessment of early childhood Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD; e.g., ADOS, ADI-R, SCQ, SRS, CHAT, MESL) within 21 European countries. These tools are essential for internationally competitive early ASD detection research. We identified a considerable variation not only in the availability, but also psychometric standardization, and formal distribution of the instruments between the countries, privileging English speaking, high-income, and highly populated European countries. Absence of country-specific standardization was a problem across many countries, independent of income and size. Findings demonstrate, on a concrete level, the challenges in creating equal early ASD identification research opportunities in Europe, and the need for increased funding for instrument development and validation. We discuss the reasons, implications, and consequences of this inequity and ways of reducing it.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Applied Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3