A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)

Published:2018-01 Issue:1 Volume:34 Page:52-63
ISSN:1015-5759
Container-title:European Journal of Psychological Assessment
language:en
Short-container-title:European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Author:

Quirin Markus¹²,Wróbel Monika³,Norcini Pala Andrea⁴,Stieger Stefan⁵⁶,Brosschot Jos⁷,Kazén Miguel⁸,Hicks Joshua A.⁹,Mitina Olga¹⁰,Shanchuan Dong¹¹,Lasauskaite Ruta¹²,Silvestrini Nicolas¹²,Steca Patrizia¹³,Padun Maria A.¹⁴,Kuhl Julius⁸

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, USA

2. Department of Psychiatry, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany

3. Institute of Psychology, University of Lodz, Poland

4. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, USA

5. Department of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria

6. Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany

7. Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands

8. Institute of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Germany

9. Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, USA

10. Department of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia

11. School of Psychology, Southwest University, China

12. Department of Psychology, University of Geneva, Switzerland

13. Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy

14. Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia

Abstract

Abstract. Self-report measures of affect come with a number of difficulties that can be circumvented by using indirect measurement procedures. The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT) is a recently developed measure of automatic activation of representations of affective states and traits that draws on participants’ ratings of the extent to which nonsense words purportedly originating from an artificial language bear positive or negative meaning. Here we compared psychometric properties of this procedure across 10 countries and provide versions in corresponding languages (Chinese, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Polish, Russian, and Spanish). The results suggest good reliability, metric invariance, and construct validity across countries and languages. The IPANAT thus turns out as a useful tool for the indirect assessment of affect in different languages and cultures.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Applied Psychology

Link

https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/pdf/10.1027/1015-5759/a000315

Reference78 articles.

1. The Two-Factor Model of Self-Reported Mood: A Cross-Cultural Replication

2. Multi-Country Evaluation of Affective Experience: Validation of an Abbreviated Version of the Day Reconstruction Method in Seven Countries

3. Are Women the “More Emotional” Sex? Evidence From Emotional Experiences in Social Context

4. Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited?

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Does culture moderate the encoding and recognition of negative cues? Evidence from an eye-tracking study;PLOS ONE;2024-04-17

2. Teacher Emotion Inventory: validation in a sample of Spanish teachers;Anales de Psicología;2024-04-03

3. How Humble Leadership Influences Employee Voice;Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O;2023-12-19

4. Job Satisfaction Across the Workweek;Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O;2023-12-19

5. Preliminary findings on the associations between defense mechanisms and implicit versus explicit negative affect.;Psychoanalytic Psychology;2023-10