On the Risk of Certain Psychotechnological Response Options in Multiple-Choice Tests

Author:

Kubinger Klaus D.1,Wolfsbauer Christine1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Psychological Assessment and Applied Psychometrics, Centre of Testing and Consulting, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Test authors may think about adding the response options “I don’t know the solution” and “none of the other options is correct” in order to reduce a high guessing probability for multiple-choice items. However, in this paper it was expected that different types of personality would use these response options differently, as a consequence of which they would do more or less guessing and, therefore, achieve higher or lower test scores, on average. An experiment was performed based on randomizing participants into two groups, one of them being warned that it is better to admit being unable to solve the item, and the participants were classified according to their personality scores into high-, medium-, and low-scoring. Multivariate analyses of variance (195 pupils between 14 and 19 years) disclosed that only Openness to Experience showed any (moderate) effect, and even this only for a single subtest (Cattell’s culture fair test).

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Applied Psychology

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Datenerhebung;Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften;2023

2. Sources of measurement error in pediatric intelligence testing;Methodological Innovations;2022-03

3. Comparison of formula and number-right scoring in undergraduate medical training: a Rasch model analysis;BMC Medical Education;2017-11-09

4. Articles Published in EJPA 2009–2010;European Journal of Psychological Assessment;2011-01

5. On the Changing Role of Cronbach’s α in the Evaluation of the Quality of a Measure;European Journal of Psychological Assessment;2011-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3