Measuring Feedback From Clients

Author:

Janse Pauline1,Boezen-Hilberdink Liesbeth2,van Dijk Maarten K.1,Verbraak Marc J. P. M.13,Hutschemaekers Giel J. M.3

Affiliation:

1. HSK Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands

2. Diaconessenhuis, Zorgcombinatie Noorderboog, Meppel, The Netherlands

3. Behavioral Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Treatment results can be improved by obtaining feedback from clients concerning their progress during therapy and the quality of the therapeutic relationship. This feedback can be rated using short instruments such as the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) and the Session Rating Scale (SRS), which are being increasingly used in many countries. This study investigates the validity and reliability of the Dutch ORS and SRS in a large sample of subjects (N = 587) drawn from the clients of an outpatient mental healthcare organization. The results are compared to those of previous Dutch and American studies. While both the ORS and the SRS exhibited adequate test-retest reliability and internal consistency, their concurrent validity was limited (more for the SRS than for the ORS). New standards are proposed for the Dutch ORS and SRS. The scores obtained with these standards are interpreted differently than those obtained using American standards. The clinical implications of the limited validity of the ORS and the SRS are discussed, as is the use of different standards in conjunction with these instruments.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Applied Psychology

Reference24 articles.

1. Using client feedback to improve couple therapy outcomes: A randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting.

2. Asmus, F. Crouzen, M. & van Oenen, F. J. (2004). Outcome Rating Scale. Retrieved from http://scottdmiller.com/purchase-individual-or-group-licenses.

3. Outcome Rating Scale and Session Rating Scale in psychological practice: Clinical utility of ultra-brief measures

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3