Retrospective Evaluations of Sequences

Author:

Aldrovandi Silvio1,Poirier Marie1,Kusev Petko2,Ayton Peter1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, City University London, UK

2. Department of Psychology, Kingston University London, UK

Abstract

Abstract. Retrospective evaluation (RE) of event sequences is known to be biased in various ways. The present paper presents a series of studies that examined the suggestion that the moments that are the most accessible in memory at the point of RE contribute to these biases. As predicted by this memory-based analysis, Experiment 1 showed that pleasantness ratings of word lists were biased by the presentation position of a negative item and by how easy the negative information was to retrieve. Experiment 2 ruled out the hypothesis that these findings were due to the dual nature of the task called upon. Experiment 3 further manipulated the memorability of the negative items – and corresponding changes in RE were as predicted. Finally, Experiment 4 extended the findings to more complex stimuli involving event narratives. Overall, the results suggest that assessments were adjusted based on the retrieval of the most readily available information.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,General Medicine

Reference42 articles.

1. Aldrovandi, S., Poirier, M., Kusev, P., Heussen, D. & Ayton, P. (2011). Now I like it, now I don’t: Delay effects and retrospective judgment. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2866–2871). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

2. Anderson, N. H. (1989). Functional memory and on-line attribution. In J. N. Bassili (Ed.), On-line cognition in person perception (pp. 175–220). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

3. Effects of concomitant verbal recall on order effects in personality impression formation

4. Gestalt characteristics of experiences: the defining features of summarized events

5. Forming impressions of personality.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3