The Human Right to Make One’s Own Choices – Implications for Supported Decision-Making in Persons With Dementia

Author:

Wied Theresa S.1,Knebel Maren2,Tesky Valentina A.1,Haberstroh Julia12

Affiliation:

1. Geriatric Medicine, Institute of General Practice, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

2. Interdisciplinary Ageing Research, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Abstract

Abstract. Autonomy is a human right and implies the “freedom to make one’s own choices.” The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN-CRPD) is a human rights treaty granting persons with disabilities, such as persons with dementia (PwD), legal capacity regardless of their impairments. State parties and healthcare practitioners (HCP) are obliged to enable PwD to make decisions with legal effect. The UN-CRPD does not specify the nature of support, thus, the implementation of supported decision-making (SDM) remains unclear. The objective of this review is to compile empirical support strategies for decision-making in dementia and address the specific needs of PwD. Using search terms related to “dementia,” “decision-making,” and “support,” we conducted a systematic review (following PRISMA guidelines) and searched MEDLINE and PsycINFO for empirical studies. References were cross-referenced. Information on support strategies was extracted, summarized, and thematically categorized to provide an overview of international literature on SDM in dementia. Initially, we found 2,348 articles. Thirty-five full-text articles were screened for eligibility (criteria followed PICOS model), 11 of which met the inclusion criteria. Strategies to support decision-making in PwD were categorized according to approach. Support began either with the individual and his/her specific abilities or with the social, spatial, and procedure-oriented environment. As the first systematic review on SDM for PwD, this article contributes to the implementation of SDM in practice. Despite heterogeneous evidence, the findings have crucial implications for HCP on how to enable PwD to exercise their human right to make decisions with legal effect.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Reference48 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3