The Association of Interpersonal Stress with Psychological Distress in Romania

Author:

Bancila Delia1,Mittelmark Maurice B.1,Hetland Jørn1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway

Abstract

Data from a community sample in Romania are presented on how social support and stress in interpersonal relationships are related to psychological distress (depressive symptoms, anxiety, and loneliness). Other predictor variables in the study were stress from daily living, self-efficacy, age, and gender. An important feature was the inclusion of measures of positive and negative aspects of interpersonal relationships. Many studies emphasize either social support, or interpersonal stress, but rarely both. A random population-based sample of 1000 was drawn from age groups 25-29, 40-44 and 75-79. A study questionnaire was mailed to the sample. The analysis sample size was 581 (63 percent of the 922 persons located). The hypothesized relationships between the stressors, the resources, and psychological distress were examined using structural equation models. All the fit statistics indicated a good fit of the data to the model. The variance in psychological distress explained by the predictor variables was 0.83. There were no statistically significant age differences in the relationship between the predictors and psychological distress. Results confirm the study's basic premise, that social support influences psychological distress levels in a protective way, as does self-efficacy, while interpersonal stress and worries about daily living are significant predictors for elevated psychological distress. The study confirms the importance of including measures of positive and of negative social ties in studies of psychological distress in community samples.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Reference54 articles.

1. Everyday stressors and gender differences in daily distress.

2. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.

3. Arbuckle, J.L. Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user's guide . Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation

4. Bandura, A. (1997). Exercise of control and collective efficacy in changing societies. In Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman

5. Bjelland, I. Dahl, A. Haug, T. D, N. (2000). The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale . Unpublished manuscript, Bergen

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3