The Context for a European Framework for Psychologists' Training

Author:

Peiro José Maria1,Lunt Ingrid2

Affiliation:

1. University of Valencia, Spain

2. Institute of Education, University of London, UK

Abstract

In this paper we analyze the context in which the European Framework for Psychologists Training was developed over a 2-year period 1999-2001. The increasingly global context in which European psychologists have to function suggests that the costs of not having a common framework are too great. Pressures by the European Union to promote mobility and convergence across the European member states create further impetus for a common framework. The wider European context provides an interesting tension between diversity and overarching common commitments and principles. It is suggested that the benefits of a common framework outweigh the disadvantages. These benefits include greater student and staff mobility, a clearer identity of European psychology, increased opportunities to attract world-class scholars to European universities, enhanced transparency of qualifications, and common solutions to problems at a European level. We argue that European psychology cannot afford not to have a common European framework for education and training and conclude with a projection and suggestion of what might be achieved in next 10 years.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Reference22 articles.

1. Berry, J.W. Poortinga, Y.H. Segall, M.H. Dasen, P.R. (1992). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and application. . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

2. Diaz, R. Berenguer, G. Quintanilla, I. (1995a). Spanish psychologists and the labor market. In A. Schorr, & S. Saari (Eds.), Psychology in Europe. Facts, figures and realities (pp.111-124). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.

3. Diaz, R. Berenguer, G. Quintanilla, I. (1995b). Defining a modern phenomenon: Psychologists in Spanish society. In A. Schorr, & S. Saari (Eds.), Psychology in Europe. Facts, figures and realities (pp.239-260). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.

4. Drunen, P. van (1995). Professional psychology in the Netherlands. In A. Schorr, & S. Saari (Eds.), Psychology in Europe. Facts, figures and realities (pp.77-96). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Routes for Specialization in Psychology throughout Europe;Behavioral Sciences;2019-12-19

2. History and Emerging Trends in Education and Training for Clinical Psychology in the European Union ☆;Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology;2017

3. Teaching and Learning Work, Organization, and Personnel Psychology Internationally. The Erasmus Mundus Program;Internationalizing the Curriculum in Organizational Psychology;2013-11-26

4. Undergraduate Education in Psychology;Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition;2012-09-26

5. The European Federation of Psychology Students’ Associations;European Psychologist;2011-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3