Affiliation:
1. Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany
2. University of Zurich, Switzerland
Abstract
Although utility analysis (UA) could be an important tool to show the utility of human resource (HR) activities, little is known about its usage. Only Macan and Highhouse (1994) showed that it is used by nearly half of the surveyed US industrial/organizational psychologists and HR professionals. As an extended and refined update of this study, we surveyed Swiss HR managers about their UA usage. Furthermore, we tried to replicate the predictors of the attitude toward UA indicated by Macan and Highhouse’s exploratory results, and used previous theorizing to add predictors. The results revealed that only 8% HR managers used UA. The demand for utility information, the plausibility of UA, and the nonuse of other utility approaches were significant predictors.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Personalauswahl;Springer-Lehrbuch;2019
2. The Utility of Personnel Selection Decisions;Journal of Personnel Psychology;2018-10
3. Comparing financial and social costs for top-down versus fixed-band selection: A practical application with bus drivers;Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration;2016-12-01
4. References;Personnel Selection;2016-04-04
5. Utility Analysis: Implementation Before Integration;Industrial and Organizational Psychology;2014-12