COVID-19 – International Psychology’s Role in Addressing Healthcare Disparities and Ethics in Marginalized Communities

Author:

Rami Falu1ORCID,Searight H. Russell2ORCID,Dryjanska Laura3,Battista Peter4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Dr. Falu Global Psychology/Independent Consultant, La Palma, CA, USA

2. Department of Psychology, Lake Superior State University, Sault Sainte Marie, MI, USA

3. Rosemead School of Psychology, Biola University, La Mirada, CA, USA

4. Department of Psychology, Adler University, Chicago, IL, USA

Abstract

Abstract. This conceptual paper provides an overview of the impact of COVID-19 on healthcare disparities and particularly its impact on marginalized communities. This critical analysis addresses the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 3, 10, and 16, which include health and well-being, reduction of inequality between and within countries, and the need for peaceful and inclusive societies. COVID-19 has infected over 189 million individuals in 220 countries and territories. The pandemic exposed long-standing healthcare inequities between and within countries. Prior to the pandemic, there were limited health and mental health services available to marginalized communities, individuals of lower socioeconomic status, and those in low- and middle-income countries; COVID-19 overburdened healthcare and mental health systems, which resulted in grave mental and physical health consequences. SDG 10 focuses on reducing inequality within and between countries and the need for advocacy for vulnerable groups. International psychology is in a unique position to address the ethical issues associated with healthcare disparities and rationing of care. SDG 3 addresses the need for good health and well-being for all. Achieving this goal is a challenge because of unequal access to healthcare and barriers to services continue, particularly in countries without universal healthcare. Goal 16 focuses on creating and promoting peaceful, just, and inclusive societies and institutions. However, access to healthcare does not erase long-standing histories of injustice, colonialism, and discrimination. Additionally, appreciation of the suspicion with which many minority communities view the healthcare system can be the first step in addressing vaccine reluctance.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Applied Psychology,Clinical Psychology,Social Psychology

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3